Why can’t they just accept what we say is the case and conclude it’s science that’s got it all wrong and work to improve the design of their experiments to actually reflect reality. I find the T3 explanation by far the most plausible, no doubt coloured by my own experience where my brain fog was hugely improved when I took NDT with near immediate effects, like those poor darn mice my symptoms were reversed even though there was a very long delay before any treatment was initiated, the improvements were rapid once T3 was in the mix.Īs for aromatherapy, aerobic excercise regimens and neuropsychology and several paragraphs on research trying to insinuate women really do not know anything about how they feel, symptoms come from suggestibility or are unaffected by thyroid hormone doses - most likely a range of woefully inadequate wrong doses - it makes for pretty grim reading. If we carry on with the piecemeal approach at present we’ll get nowhere fast to finding any answers. I imagine the number of dissatisfied patients would plummet. We’d get a true measure of what’s thyroid related brain fog and what isn’t. They could then concentrate study on the poor devils who still feel unwell after trying all three choices. The only way to find out what thyroid hormone protocol best reduces brain fog is to let us freely choose what to take, have sensible measures of individual optimisation including patient reported symptoms, not just TSH, and the answer would become apparent. If they use TSH as the measure for dosing patients on T4, T4 /T3 combination therapy and NDT which would seem to me highly inappropriate, how can they even expect to get any meaningful results from any of their studies?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |